Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to South El Monte
This post compares Ashland, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $389,400 |
| White | 44% | 59% |
| Black | 17% | 0% |
| Asian | 20% | 14% |
| With Kids | 42% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 68% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or South El Monte?
A: Ashland has a similar population count than South El Monte: 24477 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z