Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Simi Valley
This post compares Ashland, California to Simi Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Simi Valley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 126,546 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $61,651 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $508,600 |
| White | 44% | 79% |
| Black | 17% | 1% |
| Asian | 20% | 9% |
| With Kids | 42% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 68% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Simi Valley?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Simi Valley: 24477 compared with 126546 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Simi Valley?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Simi Valley?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 28% for Simi Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z