Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Selma
This post compares Ashland, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $171,200 |
| White | 44% | 78% |
| Black | 17% | 0% |
| Asian | 20% | 4% |
| With Kids | 42% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 68% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Selma?
A: Ashland has a similar population count than Selma: 24477 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z