Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to San Francisco
This post compares Ashland, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $927,400 |
| White | 44% | 47% |
| Black | 17% | 5% |
| Asian | 20% | 34% |
| With Kids | 42% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 68% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or San Francisco?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 24477 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 68% for Ashland versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z