Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to San Fernando
This post compares Ashland, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $370,300 |
| White | 44% | 57% |
| Black | 17% | 1% |
| Asian | 20% | 1% |
| With Kids | 42% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 68% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or San Fernando?
A: Ashland has a similar population count than San Fernando: 24477 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z