Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to San Bruno
This post compares Ashland, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $754,700 |
| White | 44% | 49% |
| Black | 17% | 1% |
| Asian | 20% | 28% |
| With Kids | 42% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 68% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or San Bruno?
A: Ashland has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 24477 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z