Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Ashland, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $444,200 |
| White | 44% | 62% |
| Black | 17% | 9% |
| Asian | 20% | 13% |
| With Kids | 42% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 68% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 24477 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z