Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Ashland, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $633,400 |
| White | 44% | 75% |
| Black | 17% | 1% |
| Asian | 20% | 13% |
| With Kids | 42% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 68% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Pleasant Hill?
A: Ashland has a smaller population count than Pleasant Hill: 24477 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z