Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Pittsburg
This post compares Ashland, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $324,500 |
| White | 44% | 33% |
| Black | 17% | 16% |
| Asian | 20% | 17% |
| With Kids | 42% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 68% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Pittsburg?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Pittsburg: 24477 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z