Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Pico Rivera
This post compares Ashland, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $380,200 |
| White | 44% | 55% |
| Black | 17% | 0% |
| Asian | 20% | 3% |
| With Kids | 42% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 36 |
| Rentals | 68% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Pico Rivera?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 24477 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z