Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Palm Springs
This post compares Ashland, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $340,600 |
| White | 44% | 83% |
| Black | 17% | 4% |
| Asian | 20% | 4% |
| With Kids | 42% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 54 |
| Rentals | 68% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Palm Springs?
A: Ashland has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 24477 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z