Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Los Angeles
This post compares Ashland, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $549,800 |
| White | 44% | 52% |
| Black | 17% | 8% |
| Asian | 20% | 11% |
| With Kids | 42% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 68% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Los Angeles?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 24477 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 68% for Ashland versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z