Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Lake Forest
This post compares Ashland, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Lake Forest (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 81,812 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $64,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $585,100 |
| White | 44% | 67% |
| Black | 17% | 2% |
| Asian | 20% | 15% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 68% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Lake Forest?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Lake Forest: 24477 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z