Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Laguna Hills
This post compares Ashland, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $649,700 |
| White | 44% | 69% |
| Black | 17% | 2% |
| Asian | 20% | 14% |
| With Kids | 42% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 41 |
| Rentals | 68% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Laguna Hills?
A: Ashland has a similar population count than Laguna Hills: 24477 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z