Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Foster City
This post compares Ashland, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Foster City (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,477 | 33,529 |
Income (median) | $40,407 | $105,889 |
Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $1,051,000 |
White | 44% | 43% |
Black | 17% | 2% |
Asian | 20% | 47% |
With Kids | 42% | 33% |
Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
Rentals | 68% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Foster City?
A: Ashland has a smaller population count than Foster City: 24477 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z