Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Foothill Farms
This post compares Ashland, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $201,200 |
| White | 44% | 67% |
| Black | 17% | 9% |
| Asian | 20% | 5% |
| With Kids | 42% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 68% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Foothill Farms?
A: Ashland has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 24477 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z