Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Beverly Hills
This post compares Ashland, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 44% | 82% |
| Black | 17% | 1% |
| Asian | 20% | 9% |
| With Kids | 42% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 43 |
| Rentals | 68% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Beverly Hills?
A: Ashland has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 24477 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z