Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to Azusa
This post compares Ashland, California to Azusa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | Azusa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 49,029 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $36,825 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $367,500 |
| White | 44% | 45% |
| Black | 17% | 2% |
| Asian | 20% | 12% |
| With Kids | 42% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 29 |
| Rentals | 68% | 47% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or Azusa?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than Azusa: 24477 compared with 49029 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in Azusa?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or Azusa?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 47% for Azusa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z