Compare-Cities.com
Compare Arvin to Foster City
This post compares Arvin, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Arvin (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,826 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $21,815 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $132,300 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 87% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 47% |
| With Kids | 67% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 40 |
| Rentals | 54% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Arvin or Foster City?
A: Arvin has a smaller population count than Foster City: 20826 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Arvin or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Arvin.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Arvin or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Arvin.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Arvin does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Arvin versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Arvin may include: Wasco, Dinuba, and Madera.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z