Compare-Cities.com
Compare Arvin to Foothill Farms
This post compares Arvin, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Arvin (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,826 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $21,815 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $132,300 | $201,200 |
| White | 87% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 0% | 5% |
| With Kids | 67% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 33 |
| Rentals | 54% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Arvin or Foothill Farms?
A: Arvin has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 20826 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Arvin or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Arvin.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Arvin or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Arvin.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Arvin does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Arvin versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Arvin may include: Wasco, Dinuba, and Madera.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z