Compare-Cities.com
Compare Antioch to South San Francisco
This post compares Antioch, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Antioch (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,026 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $49,835 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $330,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 44% | 33% |
| Black | 20% | 2% |
| Asian | 10% | 39% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 39% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Antioch or South San Francisco?
A: Antioch has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 110026 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Antioch or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Antioch.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Antioch or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Antioch.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Antioch does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Antioch versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Antioch may include: Suisun-City, Pittsburg, and Fairfield.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z