Compare-Cities.com
Compare Antioch to Foothill Farms
This post compares Antioch, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Antioch (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,026 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $49,835 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $330,900 | $201,200 |
| White | 44% | 67% |
| Black | 20% | 9% |
| Asian | 10% | 5% |
| With Kids | 43% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 33 |
| Rentals | 39% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Antioch or Foothill Farms?
A: Antioch has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 110026 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Antioch or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Antioch.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Antioch or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Antioch.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Antioch versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Antioch may include: Suisun-City, Pittsburg, and Fairfield.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z