Compare-Cities.com
Compare Antioch to Beverly Hills
This post compares Antioch, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Antioch (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,026 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $49,835 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $330,900 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 44% | 82% |
| Black | 20% | 1% |
| Asian | 10% | 9% |
| With Kids | 43% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 39% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Antioch or Beverly Hills?
A: Antioch has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 110026 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Antioch or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Antioch.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Antioch or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Antioch.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Antioch versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Antioch may include: Suisun-City, Pittsburg, and Fairfield.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z