Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to South San Francisco
This post compares Altadena, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 53% | 33% |
| Black | 22% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 39% |
| With Kids | 29% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or South San Francisco?
A: Altadena has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 45236 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z