Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to South El Monte
This post compares Altadena, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $389,400 |
| White | 53% | 59% |
| Black | 22% | 0% |
| Asian | 6% | 14% |
| With Kids | 29% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 29% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or South El Monte?
A: Altadena has a larger population count than South El Monte: 45236 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z