Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Selma
This post compares Altadena, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $171,200 |
| White | 53% | 78% |
| Black | 22% | 0% |
| Asian | 6% | 4% |
| With Kids | 29% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 30 |
| Rentals | 29% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Selma?
A: Altadena has a larger population count than Selma: 45236 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z