Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to San Fernando
This post compares Altadena, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $370,300 |
| White | 53% | 57% |
| Black | 22% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 1% |
| With Kids | 29% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 33 |
| Rentals | 29% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or San Fernando?
A: Altadena has a larger population count than San Fernando: 45236 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z