Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to San Bruno
This post compares Altadena, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $754,700 |
| White | 53% | 49% |
| Black | 22% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 28% |
| With Kids | 29% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or San Bruno?
A: Altadena has a similar population count than San Bruno: 45236 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z