Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Richmond
This post compares Altadena, California to Richmond, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Richmond (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 108,853 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $42,533 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $371,900 |
| White | 53% | 39% |
| Black | 22% | 20% |
| Asian | 6% | 14% |
| With Kids | 29% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 29% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Richmond?
A: Altadena has a much smaller population count than Richmond: 45236 compared with 108853 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Richmond?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Richmond?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 49% for Richmond.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z