Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Altadena, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $444,200 |
| White | 53% | 62% |
| Black | 22% | 9% |
| Asian | 6% | 13% |
| With Kids | 29% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 29% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Altadena has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 45236 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z