Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Altadena, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $633,400 |
| White | 53% | 75% |
| Black | 22% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 13% |
| With Kids | 29% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Pleasant Hill?
A: Altadena has a larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 45236 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z