Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Pittsburg
This post compares Altadena, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $324,500 |
| White | 53% | 33% |
| Black | 22% | 16% |
| Asian | 6% | 17% |
| With Kids | 29% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 29% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Pittsburg?
A: Altadena has a smaller population count than Pittsburg: 45236 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z