Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Palm Springs
This post compares Altadena, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $340,600 |
| White | 53% | 83% |
| Black | 22% | 4% |
| Asian | 6% | 4% |
| With Kids | 29% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 54 |
| Rentals | 29% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Palm Springs?
A: Altadena has a similar population count than Palm Springs: 45236 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z