Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Lancaster
This post compares Altadena, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $213,100 |
| White | 53% | 62% |
| Black | 22% | 21% |
| Asian | 6% | 4% |
| With Kids | 29% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 32 |
| Rentals | 29% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Lancaster?
A: Altadena has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 45236 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z