Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Fairfield
This post compares Altadena, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $341,500 |
| White | 53% | 46% |
| Black | 22% | 14% |
| Asian | 6% | 17% |
| With Kids | 29% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 29% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Fairfield?
A: Altadena has a much smaller population count than Fairfield: 45236 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z