Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares Altadena, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $154,600 |
| White | 53% | 70% |
| Black | 22% | 7% |
| Asian | 6% | 2% |
| With Kids | 29% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 29% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Altadena has a larger population count than Desert Hot Springs: 45236 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z