Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Chino Hills
This post compares Altadena, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $567,200 |
| White | 53% | 46% |
| Black | 22% | 4% |
| Asian | 6% | 33% |
| With Kids | 29% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 38 |
| Rentals | 29% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Chino Hills?
A: Altadena has a smaller population count than Chino Hills: 45236 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Altadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z