Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Beverly Hills
This post compares Altadena, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 53% | 82% |
| Black | 22% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 9% |
| With Kids | 29% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 43 |
| Rentals | 29% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Beverly Hills?
A: Altadena has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 45236 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z