Compare-Cities.com
Compare Altadena to Bakersfield
This post compares Altadena, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Altadena (CDP) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,236 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $64,923 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,800 | $228,400 |
| White | 53% | 68% |
| Black | 22% | 7% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 29% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 30 |
| Rentals | 29% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Altadena or Bakersfield?
A: Altadena has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 45236 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Altadena or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Altadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Altadena or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Altadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Altadena versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Altadena may include: Vallejo, Antioch, and Castro-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z