Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alhambra to South San Francisco
This post compares Alhambra, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alhambra (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 85,168 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $42,713 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $553,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 22% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 50% | 39% |
| With Kids | 29% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 59% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alhambra or South San Francisco?
A: Alhambra has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 85168 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alhambra or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Alhambra.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alhambra or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Alhambra.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alhambra does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 59% for Alhambra versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alhambra may include: San-Gabriel, Daly-City, and Rosemead.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z