Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alhambra to Riverbank
This post compares Alhambra, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alhambra (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 85,168 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $42,713 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $553,800 | $247,200 |
| White | 22% | 79% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 50% | 4% |
| With Kids | 29% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 32 |
| Rentals | 59% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alhambra or Riverbank?
A: Alhambra has a larger population count than Riverbank: 85168 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alhambra or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Alhambra.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alhambra or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Alhambra.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alhambra does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 59% for Alhambra versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alhambra may include: San-Gabriel, Daly-City, and Rosemead.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z