Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alhambra to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Alhambra, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alhambra (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 85,168 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $42,713 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $553,800 | $444,200 |
| White | 22% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 50% | 13% |
| With Kids | 29% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 35 |
| Rentals | 59% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alhambra or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Alhambra has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 85168 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alhambra or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Alhambra.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alhambra or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Alhambra.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alhambra does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 59% for Alhambra versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alhambra may include: San-Gabriel, Daly-City, and Rosemead.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z