Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to South Pasadena
This post compares Alameda, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $928,500 |
| White | 48% | 54% |
| Black | 7% | 3% |
| Asian | 31% | 29% |
| With Kids | 31% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 40 |
| Rentals | 53% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or South Pasadena?
A: Alameda has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 78246 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 53% for Alameda versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z