Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to San Fernando
This post compares Alameda, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $370,300 |
| White | 48% | 57% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 31% | 1% |
| With Kids | 31% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 53% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or San Fernando?
A: Alameda has a larger population count than San Fernando: 78246 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Alameda versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z