Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to Pittsburg
This post compares Alameda, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $324,500 |
| White | 48% | 33% |
| Black | 7% | 16% |
| Asian | 31% | 17% |
| With Kids | 31% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 35 |
| Rentals | 53% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or Pittsburg?
A: Alameda has a similar population count than Pittsburg: 78246 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Alameda versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z