Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to Lincoln
This post compares Alameda, California to Lincoln, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | Lincoln (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 46,404 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $59,287 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $389,900 |
| White | 48% | 81% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 31% | 6% |
| With Kids | 31% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 43 |
| Rentals | 53% | 21% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or Lincoln?
A: Alameda has a larger population count than Lincoln: 78246 compared with 46404 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in Lincoln?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or Lincoln?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Alameda versus 21% for Lincoln.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z