Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to Laguna Hills
This post compares Alameda, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $649,700 |
| White | 48% | 69% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 31% | 14% |
| With Kids | 31% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 41 |
| Rentals | 53% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or Laguna Hills?
A: Alameda has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 78246 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Alameda versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z