Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to Foothill Farms
This post compares Alameda, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $201,200 |
| White | 48% | 67% |
| Black | 7% | 9% |
| Asian | 31% | 5% |
| With Kids | 31% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 53% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or Foothill Farms?
A: Alameda has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 78246 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 53% for Alameda versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z