Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to Burbank
This post compares Alameda, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $574,300 |
| White | 48% | 70% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 31% | 11% |
| With Kids | 31% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 53% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or Burbank?
A: Alameda has a smaller population count than Burbank: 78246 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 53% for Alameda versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z