Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to Beverly Hills
This post compares Alameda, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 48% | 82% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 31% | 9% |
| With Kids | 31% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 43 |
| Rentals | 53% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or Beverly Hills?
A: Alameda has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 78246 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 53% for Alameda versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z